2005-06-29

environments, color pictures, mergers

Wrote text in the post-starburst environment paper.

Helped Burles and Tongyan with color pictures of gravitational lenses.

Worked out (yes, it is obvious) that if the merger rate onto LRGs as a function of secondary magnitude is proportional to the luminosity function, then the mass-weighted merger rate will be dominated by galaxies around L-star. If it is going to diverge to the faint end, then the LRG-galaxy cross correlation will be a very strong function of the secondary galaxy magnitude, with dwarfs having much higher amplitude cross-correlation than giants. Doesn't seem likely; in fact I think we know this not to be true. The assertion in Murali et al 2002 that the mass build-up in galaxies is dominated by smooth accretion rather than merger events (is this the work upon which Romeel's assertion is based?) is not very robust, as it involves a huge extrapolation below the mass resolution of the simulation.

4 comments:

  1. It's true that galaxies in SPH simulations gain most of their mass through smooth accretion of gas,
    not through mergers with pre-existing galaxies. Further, the global history of star formation tracks the global history of gas accretion rather than the merger history. Interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  2. A comment to let my blog's link. The stuff of a daily summary has been interesting for this week, hope it keeps working.

    Tomorrow I hope I can put a raw version of the pictures on-line, I'll send you the link.

    And a question: how does the SPH and SAM results compare to each other in the field of "accretion X merger"??

    I'm still trying to understand this new Salvador-Sole result about the non-direct-dependency of the properties inside r_s and the halo history. I know he's gonna say lots about it in Paris.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think the Salvador-Solé results only apply to DM halos, not the galaxies in them, so it isn't directly relevant, although the group-group merger rate is one of our next projects...

    ReplyDelete
  4. You're right, the results of Salvador-Sole SAMs are for DM halos only. I'll take a carefull look at the paper going to Paris and then at his talk.

    Hope the have the pictures tomorrow. Today it was not possible :-)

    ReplyDelete