As my loyal readers know (both of them, I hope), the astrometry.net project, among other things, will use an index of quadrangles of stars to identify fields blind
, ie, even when the user doesn't remember
 the image pointing, rotation, or scale.  I spent quite a bit of time this weekend working out (and recalling) the statistics of such quadrangles:  How many are there on the sky?  How many unique quads can we index, given finite positional errors?  How many quads do we expect in a finite, rectangular image of given dimensions?  What fraction of fields will we fail to solve, given the need for redundant successes?  Etc.  The goal is to re-solve all of the SDSS images blind.
2006-02-12
quad statistics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
I knew that.
ReplyDelete