As my loyal readers know (both of them, I hope), the astrometry.net project, among other things, will use an index of quadrangles of stars to identify fields blind
, ie, even when the user doesn't remember
the image pointing, rotation, or scale. I spent quite a bit of time this weekend working out (and recalling) the statistics of such quadrangles: How many are there on the sky? How many unique quads can we index, given finite positional errors? How many quads do we expect in a finite, rectangular image of given dimensions? What fraction of fields will we fail to solve, given the need for redundant successes? Etc. The goal is to re-solve all of the SDSS images blind.
2006-02-12
quad statistics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I knew that.
ReplyDelete